Journal 3 Identical copy discuss

Journal #3

-----Opinion about identical copy of a person

(This article is created by XIANGRUI SU with English Author name Leo. Article contain some ideas from Kenneth' s research achievement and Gleiser's article. Any unauthorized copy, quote and referencing are not allowed)

There seems a controversy in the academic community, which is about identical copy of a person. In year 20015, our world still have some person will not support direct copy of a human. Marcelo Cleiser described in his article “Is an Identical Copy of You, You” that Brain Preservation Foundation’s president, who also as co-founder and known as Doctor Kenneth Hayworth make an argument about identical copy of person by exampling. Doctor Kenneth H hold a negative opinion of developing identical copy technique, and he expound why identical copy can not replace people themselves, also gives strongly disagree opinion of continuing this research. If we suppose science will be developed in forward direction, then in the article published year people still hold passive bearing of it is the tips that scientist should not do that kind of research so far. Developing, studying and using identical copy of human technique currently will put human beings into very dangerous situation. Referencing from video speaker opinion, there was not a golden rule for identical copy, however the Golden rule for keep safe in this field is, do not research it. Try to imaging a scenario that one person’s identical copy is powerful than the original person. There is no way for that person to keep control for his or her identical copy. In theory, this is true. If an identical copy can be made, which will imply that the ‘copy’ has a programmable and equal power brain. Due to the brain are in same power, also can be programmed, which will means an optimization can be achieved. People can not make more powerful person under control. Emotion, does as speaker’s opinion, can not be replaced. This is equal to say, identical copy is just a copy, not the real human. The answer of question if the identical copy would actually be people themselves’ are always false.