Summary
According to Jon
Gertner in his article “True Innovation,” published in The New York Times on
Feb. 25, 2012, innovation is not only the idealized form, but also has some
different styles with which we may not be familiar. The popular understanding
of innovation in America’s present culture is the pursuit of fast changes and
huge developments. However, in more practical situation, innovation has better
performance caused by the accumulation of detailed improvements in interdisciplinary
communication. This processes include expedite idea exchange, freedom and
selflessness of research atmosphere, and the unlimited questions.
Do
you believe that the way Bell Lab works is good for business? Explain one
specific part of Kelly’s philosophy that you agree or disagree with, explaining
why. In what other kinds of businesses would this philosophy work?
Indeed, in a short
period, it is rare to see the achievement of business from the way Bell Lab
works. Because the unlimited and interest-oriented research is difficult to
satisfy the business requirement immediately, the short-sighted enterpriser
would not put this method in an important position. However, from the long
period, the benefits of this way can be displayed.
The unlimited
interdisciplinary communication discussed in this article provides a necessary
atmosphere for the researchers. Put scientists and engineers of different
concentrations together, the collision of the knowledge through the
communication would let them enlarge the database in their brain. The pressure
caused by the boundaries of disciplines releases. The combination from
different domains would make the incredible breakthrough later.
The interest-oriented
habit enhances the motivation of researchers. People always would like to do
what they really want. They dislike the limitations or insistencies, especially
for the researchers who have high confidence in their concentrated fields. The interest-oriented
habit lead to a win-win situation for both the Bell Lab and the researchers.
Bell Lab is strong enough to hire researchers who is outstanding in their own
disciplines; meanwhile, the researchers can follow their interests and generate
more meaningful ideas.
The freedom and
the environment of helping each other motivate researchers to study more
detailed and expand their fields. Most of people pursue freedom in their common
life. They consider freedom is in a significant situation for human being. Less
limited environment provides researchers a place to think more, to speak more,
and to achieve more. The inclination of helping each other also supply
researchers more assistance in their domains.
Thank you for reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.