Sunday, February 1, 2015
journal #2 Zhaoyang
Biomedical engineering, the application of engineering and techniques to medicine, which is a totally new field, has raised many issues about ethics in many fields, such as cellular, genetic and tissue engineering, biomaterials, prostheses and implants, etc. In the following part, I will answer the first question. I think that biomedical engineers should attempt to enhance the human body, because this is what technologies do. We can find the same answer in history that many new technologies were introduced to enhance the human body, especially in the medical field which human beings rely on to have a longer and healthier life. For example, Smallpox Vaccine has saved countless lives in the world. Although in the article it said that implants had issues of human identity and dignity because of using artificial structures, at least doctors can ensure their patients to have a full body. One losing his leg in an accident can still walk with an artificial leg. Hundreds of years ago, it was impossible to imagine this, isn't is? Some may question that it is good to make us have a longer life with the help of biomedical engineering? What the world will be like with more and more infants coming to the world, without anyone dying? I am worried about this too. We all have a life cycle, a beginning and an ending. If there is no ending, the world is going to be a mess. In my opinion, I think that biomedical engineering should enhance the human body, for instance, implanting an artificial leg as mentioned above, but not to intervene into the cell processing which determines body growing naturally. As for neural engineering, I strongly suggest that scientists be careful and work with ethics. Just like the article mentioned, artificial neural devices may influence a person's identity. If this is acquired by criminals or terrorists, disasters are the only result.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You make an excellent point at the end with neural biomedical engineering. I do think that it might need to be in it's own category since it affects the inner-workings of the brain where are emotions, decision-making, actions, etc. lie.
ReplyDeleteAs for the other examples you gave of Smallpox vaccine and artificial legs -- would this actually qualify as enhancing the human life, or simply correcting what is already wrong? I see the article's definition of human "enhancement" as creating a kind of perfect human in some way, even when there is no actual flaw. However, you may be of another opinion.
I agree with your last sentience. If these techniques be used for crime, it will have some unexpected consequences. Meanwhile, I have some question respecting enhancing the human life too. I cannot sure that do you think practitioners and engineers can develop some techniques to create superman?
ReplyDeleteYour point is what I want to say. Science technologies is service for human being. The ultimate goal which human never give up is how to get eternal of life. Biomedical Engineering is a feasible way to touch the goal infinitely. It has prolonged the length of life considerably. Although Biomedical Engineering has confused by the issue of morel. But I thing it will be accepted by the people who live after hundreds of years just like that we have understood what people contributed hundreds of years ago
ReplyDeleteYour point is what I want to say. Science technologies is service for human being. The ultimate goal which human never give up is how to get eternal of life. Biomedical Engineering is a feasible way to touch the goal infinitely. It has prolonged the length of life considerably. Although Biomedical Engineering has confused by the issue of morel. But I thing it will be accepted by the people who live after hundreds of years just like that we have understood what people contributed hundreds of years ago
ReplyDelete